- Open Access
SV40-Immortalized Human Fibroblasts as a Source of SV40 Infectious Virions
© Feinstein Institute for Medical Research 2004
- Received: 4 August 2004
- Accepted: 15 October 2004
- Published: 30 October 2004
Human fibroblasts immortalized by Simian Virus 40 (SV40) are widely employed for cell and molecular biology model of study. Indeed, SV40 transmission to humans was believed to occur only under exceptional situations. The oncogenic potential of SV40 in laboratory animals is well established, whereas its involvement in human carcinogenesis is still a matter of active investigations. A recent report links SV40 exposure with the development of a brain tumor in a laboratory researcher. In previous studies, episomal viral DNA was detected in SV40 stably transformed and immortalized fibroblast cell lines. In this study, we report molecular and biological characterizations of SV40 DNA in human fibroblast cells. Our results indicate that SV40 is able to establish a persistent infection in long-term immortalized human fibroblasts, resulting in the production of an infectious viral progeny, which is able to infect both monkey and human cells. These data indicate that SV40-immortalized human fibroblasts may represent a source of SV40 infection. To avoid the SV40 infection, careful attention should be given by operators to this SV40-cell model of study.
In a recent report (1), the authors proposed that direct exposure to Simian Virus 40 (SV40) lead to brain tumor development in a laboratory researcher. SV40 is a natural infectious agent for monkeys, whereas more recent investigations indicate that this viral agent is also a human virus (2). It is well known that SV40 was administered to humans through contaminated vaccines, mainly antipolio vaccines between 1955 and 1963 (3,4). The possibility of a human-to-human transmission of SV40 was taken into consideration only recently (5). Indeed, SV40 DNA sequences were detected in normal and neoplastic tissues of persons too young (1 to 30 y) or too old (60 to 85 y) to have been vaccinated with SV40-contaminated polio vaccines (2). This finding may also explain the lack of difference in cancer incidence between individuals vaccinated with SV40-contaminated and SV40-free polio vaccines (6). SV40 sequences were detected in blood and sperm specimens of normal individuals and blood samples of patients (reviewed in ) while SV40 virions were found in urine samples (7), indicating that blood, sperm, and urine may represent routes/vehicles of transmission of SV40 horizontal infection in humans. Support to the diffusion of SV40 in the human population is provided by the presence of SV40 sequences in human brain tumors, other neoplasms, and normal tissues of children and adults (reviewed in 2;8–11); specific SV40-neutralizing antibodies in human sera (12,13); and SV40 large T antigen (Tag) antibodies in sera of mesothelioma patients (14). A scientific panel recently established the importance of assessing the ways of contagion and the mechanisms of SV40 transmission in humans (5).
How SV40 may establish a persistent infection in human cells is poorly understood. It has been reported that some human cells such as human spongioblasts, fetal neural cells, and tumor cell lines are lytically infected by SV40 (15,16). On the other hand, human mesothelial cells do not support the lytic infection efficiently, but rather they are transformed at high rate by SV40 and release SV40 virions soon after infection (17,18). A different behavior was described for SV40-infected human fibroblast cell lines. Indeed, they (1) produce a limited SV40 viral progeny, (2) are transformed, and (3) may become immortalized but at a low rate (19). Immortalized human fibroblasts have been shown to contain SV40 DNA in the integrated form and not to produce a wild-type SV40 progeny (20–22). However, on this experimental model, few studies reported the persistence of SV40 mutants, lacking the expression of the small t antigen (tag) and with a deleted form of the large T antigen (Tag), able to complete a replicative cycle (21,22). Recently, it has been demonstrated that human SV40-immortalized fibroblasts might contain differentsized SV40 genomes, including complete viral genomes (23). SV40-immortalized human fibroblasts have been widely employed as cell and molecular biology model to study DNA replication and repair, cell cycle, immortalization and transformation (8). SV40-immortalized fibroblast cell lines were therefore broadly disseminated in many research laboratories.
Following the report by Arrington and colleagues (1) describing the SV40 detection in a brain tumor of a scientist who worked with a SV40-immortalized fibroblast cell line, we investigated long-term SV40-immortalized human fibroblasts. We show that these cells, which are routinely used in many laboratories since the 1980s, may represent a source of SV40 infection. In a previous study, we reported the presence of episomal SV40 DNA in 3 of 9 SV40-immortalized human fibroblast cell lines, showing that these cells release an infectious viral progeny (24). Here, we describe the molecular characterization of the viral DNA persisting as an episome in these human cells. In addition, we further assess that even though the MRC5-SV2 fibroblasts have been cultured for over 2 decades as immortal cell lines, they support a complete SV40 replicative cycle and release an infectious wildtype viral progeny.
Cell Lines and Cell Culture
MRC5-SV2 cells are derived from fetal lung fibroblast strain MRC-5 by infection with SV40 strain VA45-54-2 (20,24). CV-1 cells are monkey kidney cells fully permissive to SV40 infection. Cell cultures were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium-F12 (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
For infections, viral inoculum was diluted in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Incubations with mild shaking were carried out for 2 h at room temperature, in 6 wells plates, in a final volume of 0.5 mL. The viral inoculum was then removed, and cells, after rinsing them with phosphate-buffered saline, were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium-F12 supplemented with 1% fetal calf serum.
Viral DNA and RNA Extractions
Viral DNA was extracted from SV40-infected cell culture medium. One hundred microliters of infected cell culture medium was incubated 1 h at 37 °C with 5 µg DNAse I and 10 µg of RNAse A to remove contaminant cellular nucleic acids. Sample proteins were lysed by adding 25 µL of 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 50 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, at room temperature for 10 min. Viral DNA was extracted twice with phenol/chloroform mixture and then ethanol precipitated. Pellet DNA was resuspended in 20 µL of Tris 10mM, EDTA 1mM.
Total cytoplasmic RNA was extracted using the commercial kit RNeasy mini (Qiagen, Milano, Italy) following the manufacturer’s instruction.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Reverse-transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) analysis
For reverse transcription (RT), 5 µg RNA was resuspended in 100 mL of a buffer containing 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 6 mM MgCl2. Contaminant DNA was removed by 2 repeated treatments with RNase-free DNase (50 U) (Roche Diagnostic, Monza, Italy) at 37 °C for 20 min, followed by phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. The RT reaction was carried out with the SuperScrip III Reverse Transcriptase from Invitrogen (Invitrogen, Milano, Italy) as indicated by the supplier. The cDNA obtained was then amplified by PCR with primers specific for the VP1 and the Tag sequences (26).
Western Blot Analysis
Proteins from 105 normal or SV40-infected cells were separated by 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred to a nitrocellulose filter. Five micrograms of 45 kDa albumin was used as molecular weight marker. SV40-VP1 was detected using a goat anti-SV40 serum and anti-goat immunoglobulin G coupled to peroxidase. The membrane was incubated for 1 h with primary antibody, diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer, and again for 1 h with secondary antibody used at dilution of 1:5000 in blocking buffer. Immunocomplex was detected by the Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) protocol (Amersham, Milano, Italy) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Antibodies and Immunofluorescence Labeling
Cells were grown in 12 mm coverslip glass. CV-1 cells were infected as described above and stained for immunofluorescence 24 h post infection (p.i.) The preparation of mouse pAb 101 anti-Tag antibody (DBA, Milano, Italy), fluorescein-conjugated anti-mouse, goat anti-SV40 antiserum, and fluorescein-conjugated anti-goat, as well as the condition for immunofluorescence microscopy, have been previously described (27,28). Cells were counterstained with 0.5 µg/mL of 4′, 6-diamino-2-phenylindole (Sigma, Milano, Italy).
Molecular Characterization of SV40 Episome DNA
SV40 DNA from Immortalized Human Fibroblasts Is Biologically Active
Once we assessed the presence of wild-type episomal SV40 DNA in human immortalized fibroblasts, we then verified whether the virus was able to multiply in human cells. Tag and VP1 transcripts, representative of early and late viral genes, were tested by RT-PCR (Figures 1B and 1C). A single RT reaction was performed on total cytoplasmic RNA, DNA-free, from MRC5-SV2 cells. Tag and VP1 specific transcripts were investigated on the same cDNA sample. To confirm the absence of contaminant DNA, a primer pair located upstream and downstream the Tag intron, was used for the PCR amplification of the viral oncoprotein coding sequences, as previously described (26). Indeed, on the c-DNA sample, these primers generated a fragment of only 229 bp, while the viral genomic amplification product of 575 bp was absent (see Figure 1B). These data confirmed that RNA contamination with viral and cellular genomic DNA did not occur.
Expression of the structural protein VP1 was tested on the same cDNA using the primer pair, which amplifies 409 bp of the VP1 coding sequence on both genomic viral DNA and cDNA (25). Because the genomic DNA was not present in the cDNA sample, we may infer the amplification product obtained for the VP1 sequence reflects the presence of mRNA specific of this late viral gene (see Figure 1C).
To verify whether the late mRNAs were also translated, the VP1 protein was analyzed by Western blotting. Using a goat anti-SV40 serum on total protein extracts of MRC5-SV2 and CV-1 cells 24 h post-infection, the 45 kDa band corresponding to the VP1 monomer was identified both in the infected cells and immortalized human fibroblasts, while it was absent in MRC5 normal fibroblasts used as control (see Figure 1D). These results support the evidence that a viral complete replicative cycle occurs in the immortalized fibroblasts, suggesting the release of a SV40 infectious viral progeny in the culture medium.
SV40 Persistent Infection in Immortalized Human Fibroblasts
Viral titers showed by SV40 VA45-54-2 strain released by immortalized human fibroblast (45-54-2MRC5) and infected CV-1 cells (45-54-2CV-1)
It is well known that SV40 was administered to human population through contaminated vaccines (3,29). The possibility of a human-to-human transmission was taken into consideration only recently (2,30). Indeed, if SV40 is able to multiply in human cells, maintaining its original biological activity, the SV40 spreading in humans can be more than a hypothesis. This possibility is suggested by recent studies reporting SV40 footprints in human tumors and normal tissues (2,9,10). Moreover, in a recent report (1), the authors proposed that direct exposure to SV40 lead to development of a brain tumor in a laboratory researcher. Furthermore, complete SV40 genomes have been cloned from a long-term SV40-immortalized human fibroblast cell line (GM00637) (23), which is widely employed in many laboratories.
Our study indicates that SV40 can establish a persistent infection in human fibroblasts lasting after the “crisis” stage. Indeed, we show that the SV40 genome characterized in MRC5-SV2 immortalized cells is wild-type and indistinguishable from the input virus. Furthermore, these cells release an infectious viral progeny able to infect with the same efficiency both monkey and human cells. The appearance of cytopathic effect induced by the viruses recovered from the human immortalized cells is slower than that induced by the same virus released by permissive CV1 cells. At present, it is not clear why SV40 viruses 45-54-2MRC5 and 45-54-2CV-1 behave differently during cell infection. Probably, some properties of the SV40 virions may depend on cellular factors rather than on specific SV40 mutations. In SV40-immortalized human cells Tag and VP1 were detected mainly in the cytoplasm, suggesting specific interactions with host proteins present in this compartment (31–35). On the other hand, it is well established that SV40 virion morphology is strictly dependent on nuclear host proteins (36,37), and it has been shown that 45-54-2MRC5 virions display an altered morphology in comparison to wild type 45-54-2CV-1 (24). Further investigations are needed to elucidate the reciprocal influence of viral and cellular proteins during post-translation process and probably in viral particles assembly. Our data on VP1 coding sequences and Western blot analysis in human fibroblasts indicate that this viral protein is wild-type. Thus, it is reasonable to infer that these cells could influence viral capsid proteins at the post-translation level. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that heat shock cognate protein 70 (hsc70) binds to VP1 immediately after translation (38), and very likely, it plays an active role during virus assembly, inhibiting premature assembly in the cytosol (39).
It is worth noting that MRC5-SV2 cells were reported to be virus producers before the “crisis” stage, but then they lost the ability to shed virus after the immortalization occurred (>100 population doublings in culture) (20). It is therefore possible that before the “crisis” stage SV40 induces in human fibroblasts an “acute” infection, which is somehow controlled by those cells overtaking crisis, in a sort of latency period. During this stage, immortalized human fibroblasts do not produce a viral progeny, but they allow the replication of the episomal SV40 DNA. Subsequently, in a fraction of the cell population, a complete replicative SV40 cycle occurs, thus establishing a persistent infection with virus production.
This scenario suggests to interpret with caution the data on the biological characterization of SV40-immortalized human fibroblasts. Indeed, the possibility of a SV40 persistent infection in human fibroblasts represents a new element to take into consideration in evaluating the biological activity of this viral agent in the human host.
The different aspects of the SV40 behavior indicate that laboratory investigators are exposed to SV40 infection not only during specific procedures involving virus spread, such as sonication, but also during routine laboratory techniques, as cell trypsinization and centrifugations. Altogether these data suggest one should handle SV40 with additional care, indicating in the biohazard laboratory the appropriate containment for this oncogenic virus.
This study was granted by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and M.I.U.R. Cofin and local projects. Laura Iaccheri was supported by a fellowship from the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Cento.
- Arlington AS, Moore MS, Butel JS. (2004) SV40-positive brain tumor in scientist with risk of laboratory exposure to the virus. Oncogene 23:2231–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barbanti-Brodano G et al. (2004) Simian virus 40 infection in humans and association with human diseases: results and hypotheses. Virology 318:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shah K, Nathanson N. (1976) Human exposure to SV40: review and comment. Am. J. Epidemiol. 103:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carbone M et al. (1997) Simian virus-40 large-T antigen binds p53 in human mesotheliomas. Nat. Med. 3:908–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferber D. (2002) Virology. Monkey virus link to cancer grows stronger. Science 296:1012–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strickler HD et al. (1998) Contamination of poliovirus vaccines with simian virus 40 (1955–1963) and subsequent cancer rates. JAMA 279:292–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li RM, Branton MH, Tanawattanacharoen S, Falk RA, Jennette JC, Kopp JB. (2002) Molecular identification of SV40 infection in human subjects and possible association with kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13:2320–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Butel JS, Lednicky JA. (1999) Cell and molecular biology of simian virus 40: implications for human infections and disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91:119–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barbanti-Brodano G et al. (1998) BK and JC human polyomaviruses and simian virus 40: natural history of infection in humans, experimental oncogenicity, and association with human tumors. Adv. Virus Res. 50:69–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jasani B et al. (2001) Association of SV40 with human tumours. Semin. Cancer Biol. 11:49–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garcea RL, Imperiale MJ. (2003) Simian virus 40 infection of humans. J. Virol. 77:5039–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jafar S, Rodriguez-Barradas M, Graham DY, Butel JS. (1998) Serological evidence of SV40 infections in HIV-infected and HIV-negative adults. J. Med. Virol. 54:276–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Basetse HR, Lecatsas G, Gerber LJ. (2002) An investigation of the occurrence of SV40 antibodies in South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. 92:825–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bright RK, Kimchi ET, Shearer MH, Kennedy RC, Pass HI. (2002) SV40 Tagspecific cytotoxic T lymphocytes generated from the peripheral blood of malignant pleural mesothelioma patients. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 50:682–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Neill FJ, Carney H, Hu Y. (1998) Host range analysis of simian virus 40, BK virus and chimeric SV40/BKV: relative expression of large T-antigen and Vp1 in infected and transformed cells. Dev. Biol. Stand. 94:191–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Neill FJ, Carroll D. (1981) Amplification of papovavirus defectives during serial low multiplicity infections. Virology 112:800–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bocchetta M et al. (2000) Human mesothelial cells are unusually susceptible to simian virus 40-mediated transformation and asbestos cocarcinogenicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:10214–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cacciotti P et al. (2001) SV40 replication in human mesothelial cells induces HGF/Met receptor activation: a model for viral-related carcinogenesis of human malignant mesothelioma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:12032–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shay JW, Wright WE. (1989) Quantitation of the frequency of immortalization of normal human diploid fibroblasts by SV40 large T-antigen. Exp. Cell Res. 184:109–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huschtscha LI, Holliday R. (1983) Limited and unlimited growth of SV40-transformed cells from human diploid MRC-5 fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 63:77–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hara H, Kaji H. (1987) Random integration of SV40 in SV40-transformed, immortalized human fibroblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 168:531–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang KC, Yamasaki EF, Snapka RM. (1999) Maintenance of episomal SV40 genomes in GM637 human fibroblasts. Virology 262:457–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Forsman ZH et al. (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of polyomavirus simian virus 40 from monkeys and humans reveals genetic variation. J. Virol. 78:9306–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morelli C, Barbisan F, Iaccheri L, Tognon M. (2004) Simian virus 40 persistent infection in long-term immortalized human fibroblast cell lines. J. Neurovirol. 10:250–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barbanti-Brodano G et al. (2004) Reactivation of infectious simian virus 40 from normal human tissues. J. Neurovirol. 10:199–205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martini F et al. (2002) Different simian virus 40 genomic regions and sequences homologous with SV40 large T antigen in DNA of human brain and bone tumors and of leukocytes from blood donors. Cancer 94:1037–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clever J, Yamada M, Kasamatsu H. (1991) Import of simian virus 40 virions through nuclear pore complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88:7333–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martini F et al. (1996) SV40 early region and large T antigen in human brain tumors, peripheral blood cells, and sperm fluids from healthy individuals. Cancer Res. 56:4820–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carbone M, Rizzo P, Pass HI. (1997) Simian virus 40, poliovaccines and human tumors: a review of recent developments. Oncogene 15:1877–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vastag B. (2002) Sewage yields clues to SV40 transmission. JAMA 288:1337–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sainis L, Angelidis C, Pagoulatos GN, Lazaridis L. (2000) HSC70 interactions with SV40 viral proteins differ between permissive and nonpermissive mammalian cells. Cell Stress Chaperones 5:132–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klawitz I, Preuss U, Scheidtmann KH. (2001) Interaction of SV40 large T antigen with components of the nucleo/cytoskeleton. Int. J. Oncol. 19:1325–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li PP, Nakanishi A, Clark SW, Kasamatsu H. (2002) Formation of transitory intrachain and interchain disulfide bonds accompanies the folding and oligomerization of simian virus 40 Vp1 in the cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:1353–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakanishi A, Shum D, Morioka H, Otsuka E, Kasamatsu H. (2002) Interaction of the Vp3 nuclear localization signal with the importin alpha 2/beta heterodimer directs nuclear entry of infecting simian virus 40. J. Virol. 76:9368–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pelkmans L, Puntener D, Helenius A. (2002) Local actin polymerization and dynamin recruitment in SV40-induced internalization of caveolae. Science 296:535–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gordon-Shaag A, Ben-Nun-Shaul O, Roitman V, Yosef Y, Oppenheim A. (2002) Cellular transcription factor Sp1 recruits simian virus 40 capsid proteins to the viral packaging signal, ses. J. Virol. 76:5915–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Milavetz BI. (2002) SP1 and AP-1 elements direct chromatin remodeling in SV40 chromosomes during the first 6 hours of infection. Virology 294:170–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cripe TP, Delos SE, Estes PA, Garcea RL. (1995) In vivo and in vitro association of hsc70 with polyomavirus capsid proteins. J. Virol. 69:7807–13.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chromy LR, Pipas JM, Garcea RL. (2003) Chaperone-mediated in vitro assembly of polyomavirus capsids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100:10477–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lednicky JA, Butel JS. (2001) Simian virus 40 regulatory region structural diversity and the association of viral archetypal regulatory regions with human brain tumors. Semin Cancer Biol 11:39–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar