- Research Article
- Open Access
Upregulation of SPRR3 Promotes Colorectal Tumorigenesis
© The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research 2010
- Received: 28 December 2009
- Accepted: 16 March 2010
- Published: 17 March 2010
Hereditary colorectal cancer develops through a series of well-defined genetic and histological changes. However, elucidation of the canonical pathway based on hereditary colorectal cancer has not provided a clear explanation of the molecular mechanisms of sporadic colorectal cancer. To identify the alterative pathways involved in sporadic colorectal tumorigenesis, we performed gene expression analysis in patients with sporadic colorectal tumors. A comparison analysis of gene expression profiles revealed a pattern of upregulation of small proline rich repeat protein 3 (SPRR3) in tumor samples. SPRR3 has previously been reported to be downregulated in esophageal cancer. However, in the present study, we observed that SPRR3 was strongly upregulated in 31 of 35 samples of sporadic colorectal tumors (88%). We also determined that overexpression of SPRR3 not only accelerates colorectal cancer cell proliferation but also is associated with lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer. Moreover, AKT was activated and p53 levels were decreased in cells that overexpressed SPRR3. In contrast to the pattern seen in esophageal cancer, these results suggest that increased expression of SPRR3 is involved in colorectal tumorigenesis.
The occurrence of colorectal cancer has gradually increased over the last decade, and colorectal carcinoma was the third most common cancer in Korea in 2005 (1). Although several oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes are known to be involved in the progression of hereditary colorectal cancer, the molecular changes associated with sporadic colorectal cancer are not yet understood (2–4). Genome-wide gene expression analysis is the method most widely used to investigate how cancer-related genes are altered during tumorigenesis (5–7). We previously identified several genes associated with molecular changes in sporadic colorectal cancers by microarray analysis of the gene expression profiles of sporadic colorectal cancer patients. When we investigated these genes, we found that SPRR3 (small proline rich repeat protein 3) was a protein associated with the molecular changes and clinicopathological features of this disease (8). SPRR proteins are known to be markers for terminal squamous cell differentiation, but they also function in nonsquamous tissues (9). For example, SPRR1A is induced by and is protective against ischemic stress in cardiomyocytes (10). It has recently been reported that SPRR3 is upregulated in celiac disease and also by prolonged exposure to cyclic strain (11,12). However, SPRR3 is frequently downregulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and it has been shown to suppress the tumorigenicity of ESCC cells (13–15).
AKT has emerged as a key molecule mediating multiple signaling pathways. AKT was discovered as an oncogene and is involved in metabolic functions, cell survival and the cell cycle (16). Recent studies have shown that AKT activates Mdm2 to accelerate p53 ubiquitination (17–19).
In this study, we showed that SPRR3 is dramatically upregulated in colorectal cancer. The ectopic expression of SPRR3 accelerates cell proliferation through AKT activation in SW480 colorectal cancer cells. Moreover, overexpressed SPRR3 is associated with lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer. Our results suggest that SPRR3 is highly expressed in colorectal tumors and may potentiate tumorigenesis in colorectal cancer.
Patients, Tissue Samples and Cell Lines
Baseline demographic and biological features of 128 colorectal cancer patients.
No. of patients (missing values)
Age, years, mean ± SD
59 ± 12
Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, ≤6/>6 ng/mL Tumor characteristics
Site,b right colon/left colon/rectum
Long diameter, ≤4/>4 cm
Growth pattern, expanding/infiltrative
Differentiation, well and moderately differentiated/poorly differentiated and mucinous
Lymphovascular invasion, no/yes
Either MLH1 or MSH2 expression, no/yes
Cloning and Transfection
The full-length cDNA encoding SPRR3 was generously provided by M-R Wang (Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China). SPRR3 cDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and subcloned into hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged pcDNA3 (pHA-SPRR3) (Invitrogen) for the generation of stable transfectants. SW480 cells were transfected with pHA-SPRR3 using lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). After selection with G418 (1 mg/mL) for 10 d, stable expression of SPRR3 (SW480/SPRR3) was confirmed by Western blot analysis with anti-HA antibody. A control cell line was established by transfecting an empty expression vector, pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen). The SPRR3 small interfering RNA (siRNA) (5′-CAGACAAGCCCUUGAGAA-3′) and nontargeting scrambled siRNA (5′-CCUACGCCACCAAUUUCGU-3′) were synthesized from the Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea) and transfected into cells with lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Knock-down efficiency was evaluated by Western blot analysis with anti-SPRR3 antibody.
Western Blot Analysis
All tissues and cells were extracted in 2 × Laemmli sample buffer (62.5 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 25% glycerol, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.01% Bromophenol Blue) (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA), separated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After blocking with skim milk in Tris-buffered saline Tween-20 (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 0.1 mol/L NaCl2, 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.4), membranes were incubated with specific primary antibodies (anti-SPRR3 antibody was from Proteintech Group [Chicago, IL, USA]; anti-AKT, anti-phospho-AKT, anti-ERK, anti-phospho-ERK, anti-phospho-p38 and anti-p53 antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technology [Beverly, MA, USA]; anti-Actin antibody was from Chemicon International [Temecula, CA, USA]; anti-HA antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology [Santa Cruz, CA, USA]; anti-mdm2 and anti-phospho-mdm2 antibodies were from BD [San Jose, CA, USA] and Calbiochem [La Jolla, CA, USA]). Then the membranes were incubated with horse radish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).
Paraffin-embedded tissue cores obtained from carcinomas were used to construct tissue microarrays and arrayed onto recipient paraffin blocks by using a precision instrument (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA). Tissue array blocks containing core cylinders were subjected to immune staining based on the labeled streptavidin-biotin method with a DAKO LSAB® kit (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA), by using monoclonal antibodies against SPRR3 (Proteintech Group, Chicago, IL, USA), MLH1 and MSH2 (G168-15 and G219-1129; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA). The SPRR3 cytoplasmic expression was classifed into two categories depending on the degree. Category I was formed by two grades, negative expression at ≤10% and positive expression at >10% staining cells; category II included two grades, downregulation at ≤50% and overexpression at >50% staining cells. The MLH1-and MSH2-stained cells were divided into two grades, negative at ≤10% and positive at >10% cells with nuclear staining. All hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining results were confirmed by two pathologists.
MTT and Flow Cytometry Assay
SW480 and SW480/SPRR3 cells were seeded into a 96-well plate. The cell proliferation rate was measured by a plate reader (absorbance 450) after incubation with Cell-counting kit 8 (CCK8) solution reagent (10 µL) (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) for 2 h. For cell-cycle distribution analysis, SW480 and SW480/SPRR3 cells were resuspended in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, fixed with 70% ethanol on ice, and incubated with propidium iodide solution (50 µg/mL) (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline, the cells were analyzed on a flow cytometer using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA)
A colony-formation assay was performed by using a Cytoselect 96-well celltransformation assay kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA, USA). Briefly, SW480 and SW480/SPRR3 cells (1 × 103) were seeded into the individual wells of a 96-well plate containing 0.6% agar/RPMI1640 medium. After culture for 14 d, the cells were solubilized, lysed and detected with CyQuant GR dye by using a fluorescence plate reader with a 485/520-nm filter (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), or the colonies were visualized by crystal violet staining (Sigma).
Presented bar data show standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences among groups were determined using the Student t test. SPRR3 expression was compared with demographic and biological parameters by cross-table analysis performed using Fisher exact or Pearson χ2 test, depending on statistical validity. We verified potential variables by multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value < 0.05, and all calculations were performed by using SPSS software (version 14; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
All supplementary materials are available online at www.molmed.org .
SPRR3 Is Upregulated in Colorectal Cancer
To investigate the molecular changes associated with colorectal tumorigenesis, we analyzed gene expression patterns in 84 patients with sporadic colorectal cancer by using a microarray (8). Among 1263 differentially expressed genes, SPRR3 was shown to be associated with molecular changes, and we therefore examined the expression level of SPRR3 in colorectal cancers. Samples of the tumor tissues and the surrounding normal tissues were obtained at the time of surgery. Among 35 colorectal cancer patients, SPRR3 was highly expressed in tumors compared with the adjacent normal mucosa in 31 cases (88%) (Figure 1A, B).
SPRR3 expression associated with demographic and biological parameters in 128 sporadic colorectal cancers
Percentage of patients with SPRR3 expressiona
Age, years, ≤50/>50
Stage,d I + II/III + IV
Site, right colon/left colone
Growth pattern, expanding/infiltrative
Differentiation, well and moderately differentiated/poorly differentiated and mucinous
Lymphovascular invasion, no/yes
Either MLH1 or MSH2 expression, no/yes
Overexpression of SPRR3 Accelerates Cell Proliferation
The significant overexpression of SPRR3 in colorectal cancer led us to investigate the effect of overexpressed SPRR3 on the proliferation rate of colon cancer cells. An SPRR3-overexpressing cell line was generated from SW480 human colon cancer cells (SW480/SPRR3 clone). As shown in Figure 3A, the ectopic expression of SPRR3 dramatically increased the proliferation rate of SW480 cells in a time-dependent manner. To determine whether the increased proliferation rate was due to acceleration of the cell cycle, we next examined the effect of SPRR3 on the distribution of cell-cycle phases. The flow cytometer results indicated that overexpression of SPRR3 in SW480 cells caused enhanced accumulation of cells in the G2/M or S phase compared with SW480 control cells (Figure 3B). We further explored the effect of SPRR3 on anchorage-independent growth by conducting a soft agar assay (Figure 3C). Colony formation was increased in the SW480/SPRR3 cells compared with control SW480 cells, suggesting that increased SPRR3 expression potentiates the growth of colorectal cancer cells.
AKT Is Activated in SPRR3-Overexpressing Cells
Loss of SPRR3 expression is frequently observed in ESCC, where it is known to inhibit tumorigenesis (Supplementary Figure 1) (13–15). However, the clinicopathological characteristics of SPRR3 have not been investigated in other types of cancers, including colorectal cancer. We have previously reported the association of several enes with molecular alterations in colorectal tumorigenesis (8). Surprisingly, in contrast to the findings in ESCC, SPRR3 was frequently and dramatically upregulated in colorectal cancers. Expression analysis with tumor samples from colorectal patients showed that the rate of SPRR3 upregulation in colorectal tumors was almost 88% (Figure 1). The analysis of the gene expression pattern in 35 colorectal cancer cases showed that SPRR3 was increased in 31 cases. Moreover, most of the colorectal cancer cell lines analyzed also exhibited an increase in the expression of SPRR3. The immunohistochemical analysis of SPRR3 expression revealed that up-regulated SPRR3 may be involved in LVI in colorectal cancer. A previous related study showed that the ratio of GATA6, which is a regulator of epithelial differentiation, to SPRR3 can significantly discriminate between normal tissue and esophageal adenocarcinoma (21). Venous and lymphatic invasion are crucial steps in the formation of micrometastases and eventual macroscopic tumor growth in a distant organ (22). LVI may thereby enhance existing staging systems for analyzing individual prognostic features (23). SPRR proteins are differentially expressed in different tissues, suggesting that they have distinct tissue-specific functions. Therefore, the differential expression of SPRR3 in colorectal and esophageal cancers might be due to different tissue-specific expression patterns. Another possible explanation of these differences is that transcriptional regulation of SPRR3 may vary according to tissue type.
Alterations in Wnt / β-catenin (CTNNB1) signaling and in MMR genes have been shown to contribute to the development of colorectal cancer. In the current study, SPRR3 overexpression was associated with deficient MLH1 and MSH2 expression, which was possibly related to the frequent AXIN2 mutations reported in MMR-deficient cells (24). AXIN2 is known to have an important role in the regulation of the stability of CTNNB1 in the Wnt-signaling pathway. However, the association of SPRR3 expression with MMR defects and female sex requires further verification in a larger cohort of colorectal cancer patients. Because the CTNNB1 complex regulates the expression of several genes that have been implicated in colorectal tumorigenesis, including Myc and Cox2 (25–27), it is possible that expression of SPRR3 might be regulated by the CTNNB1 -mediated pathway in colorectal cancer. Although we have not identified the factors involved in the regulation of SPRR3 expression, the underlying mechanisms should be examined further to elucidate the function of SPRR3 in colorectal tumorigenesis.
We also investigated the effect of ectopic expression of SPRR3 in the potentiation of colorectal tumorigenesis, and we found that SW480/SPRR3 cells showed accelerated cell proliferation compared with SW480 cells. Further evidence for a function for SPRR3 in tumorigenesis was provided by the soft agar assay. SW480/SPRR3 cells showed a high anchorage-independent proliferation rate, supporting the hypothesis that increased SPRR3 plays a role in colorectal tumorigenesis. It has been reported that SPRR1A protein is upregulated in, and is protective against, hypoxia-induced stress (10). To further elucidate the mechanisms of molecular control of SPRR3 in colorectal cancer, we next examined the effect of SPRR3 on AKT signaling. AKT signaling has been implicated in angiogenesis and tumor invasion as well as in tumor cell survival (28–29). AKT regulates cell growth by modulating several key proteins such as p21, p27, GSK3β and Mdm2 (17,30–32). Because the ectopic expression of SPRR3 markedly enhances AKT phosphorylation in colorectal cancer cells, we further explored SPRR3-mediated AKT signaling. AKT activation is mainly induced by growth-factor stimulation, which is negatively regulated by PTEN. Therefore, we investigated the expression of PTEN and phospho-PI3K in SPRR3-overexpressing cells, and found that these proteins were not significantly altered by SPRR3 expression (data not shown). It was recently reported that increased α1β1-integrin enhances SPRR3 expression (33), and integrin could induce AKT activation through the integrin-associated protein ILK (integrin-linked kinase) (34,35). The molecular mechanisms underlying the activation of AKT by SPRR3 are not clear, and further investigation is therefore needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms. We also screened the AKT downstream molecules and found that Mdm2 is a key molecule in SPRR3-mediated stimulation of cell proliferation. AKT promotes the degradation of p53 through the phosphorylation of Mdm2 (17–19), and p53 controls cell proliferation by inducing either growth arrest or apoptosis. Accordingly, p53 is frequently found in an inactivated, mutated form in many types of cancer (36–37). In this study, we found that the ectopic expression of SPRR3 downregulated p53 expression. Although the molecular factors regulating SPRR3 in colorectal cancer remain to be elucidated, these results lead us to propose that the effect of SPRR3 in promoting colorectal tumorigenesis is associated with the degradation of p53 caused by AKT activation.
To determine whether SPRR3 can be used as a prognostic or diagnostic marker in colorectal cancer, we are currently conducting an analysis of the biological and pathological characteristics of colorectal cancer. The results of the current study indicate that SPRR3 promotes cell proliferation, and that it may be a candidate biomarker for colorectal cancer.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests as defined by Molecular Medicine, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and discussion reported in this paper.
We thank SY Rha for generously providing CCD841 cells (Yonsei University, Seoul. Korea) and MR Wang and KY Choi for kindly providing SPRR3 and CTNNB1 plasmids (Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China, and Yonsei University, Seoul. Korea). This work was supported by a grant from the Basic Research Program of the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (R01-2006-000-10021-0), the Korean Health 21 Research and Development Project, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A062254), and the education and research fund from the Asan Institute for Life Science, Seoul, Korea (2006-069).
- Shin HR, et al. (2007) National cancer incidence for the year 2002 in Korea. Cancer Res. Treat. 39:139–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. (1996) Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 87:159–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jass JR. (2006) Colorectal cancer: a multipathway disease. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 12:273–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Humphries A, Wright NA. (2008) Colonic crypt organization and tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 8:415–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barrier A, et al. (2005) Colon cancer prognosis prediction by gene expression profiling. Oncogene. 24:6155–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bianchini M, et al. (2006) Comparative study of gene expression by cDNA microarray in human colorectal cancer tissues and normal mucosa. Int. J. Oncol. 29:83–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fan J, et al. (2008) Gene-expression profiling in Chinese patients with colon cancer by coupling experimental and bioinformatic genomewide gene-expression analyses: identification and validation of IFITM3 as a biomarker of early colon carcinogenesis. Cancer. 113:266–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim JC, et al. (2008) Gene expression profiling: canonical molecular changes and clinicopathological features in sporadic colorectal cancers. World J. Gastroenterol. 14:6662–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tesfaigzi J, Th’ng J, Hotchkiss JA, Harkema JR, Wright PS. (1996) A small proline-rich protein, SPRR1, is upregulated early during tobacco smoke-induced squamous metaplasia in rat nasal epithelia. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 14:478–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pradervand S, et al. (2004) Small proline-rich protein 1A is a gp130 pathway- and stress-inducible cardioprotective protein. EMBO J. 23:4517–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bracken S, Byrne G, Kelly J, Jackson J, Feighery C. (2008) Altered gene expression in highly purified enterocytes from patients with active coeliac disease. BMC Genomics. 9:377–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pyle AL, et al. (2009) Biomechanical stress induces novel arterial intima-enriched genes: implications for vascular adaptation to stress. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2010;19:e13–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abraham JM, et al. (1996) Esophagin cDNA cloning and characterization: a tissue-specific member of the small proline-rich protein family that is not expressed in esophageal tumors. Cell Growth Differ. 7:855–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen BS, et al. (2000) Decreased expression of SPRR3 in Chinese human oesophageal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 21:2147–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, et al. (2008) Exogenous expression of Esophagin/SPRR3 attenuates the tumorigenicity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells via promoting apoptosis. Int. J. Cancer. 122:260–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Franke TF. (2008) PI3K/Akt: getting it right matters. Oncogene. 27:6473–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou BP, et al. (2001) HER-2/neu induces p53 ubiquitination via Akt-mediated MDM2 phosphorylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:973–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogawara Y, et al. (2002) Akt enhances Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of p53. J. Biol. Chem. 277:21843–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mayo LD, Donner DB. (2001) A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway promotes translocation of Mdm2 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:11598–603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim JC, et al. (1996) Establishment and biological characterization of human colorectal carcinoma cell lines expressing carcinoembryonic antigen. J. Korean Cancer Assoc. 28:63–71.Google Scholar
- Kimchi ET, et al. (2005) Progression of Barrett-s metaplasia to adenocarcinoma is associated with the suppression of the transcriptional programs of epidermal differentiation Cancer Res. 65:3146–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zlobec I, Lugli A. (2008) Prognostic and predictive factors in colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Pathol. 61:561–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim SB, et al. (2009) Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in sporadic colorectal cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum. 53:377–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dong X, Seelan RS, Qian C, Mai M, Liu W. (2001) Genomic structure, chromosome mapping and expression analysis of the human AXIN2 gene. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 93:26–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He TC, et al. (1998) Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science. 281:1509–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Araki Y, et al. (2003) Regulation of cyclooxyge-nase-2 expression by the Wnt and ras pathways. Cancer Res. 63:728–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shitashige M, Hirohashi S, Yamada T. (2008) Wnt signaling inside the nucleus. Cancer Sci. 99:631–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Testa JR, Bellacosa A. (2001) AKT plays a central role in tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:10983–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCubrey JA, et al. (2006) Roles of the RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathways in malignant transformation and drug resistance. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 46:49–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cross DA, Alessi DR, Cohen P, Andjelkovich M, Hemmings BA. (1995) Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by insulin mediated by protein kinase B. Nature. 378:785–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou BP, et al. (2001) Cytoplasmic localization of p21Cip1/WAF1 by Akt-induced phosphorylation in HER-2/neu-overexpressing cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:245–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liang J, Slingerland JM. (2003) Multiple roles of the PI3K/PKB (Akt) pathway in cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle. 2:339–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pyle AL, et al. (2008) Regulation of the atheroma-enriched protein, SPRR3, in vascular smooth muscle cells through cyclic strain is dependent on integrin alpha1beta1/collagen interaction. Am. J. Pathol. 173:1577–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Troussard AA, et al. (2006) Preferential dependence of breast cancer cells versus normal cells on integrin-linked kinase for protein kinase B/Akt activation and cell survival. Cancer Res. 66:393–403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loufrani L, et al. (2008) Key role of alpha(1)beta(1)-integrin in the activation of PI3-kinase-Akt by flow (shear stress) in resistance arteries. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 294:H1906–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vazquez A, Bond EE, Levine AJ, Bond GL. (2008) The genetics of the p53 pathway, apoptosis and cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7:979–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petitjean A, Achatz MI, Borresen-Dale AL, Hainaut P, Olivier M. (2007) TP53 mutations in human cancers: functional selection and impact on cancer prognosis and outcomes. Oncogene. 26:2157–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar